Mind is the Medium
From Radio to AI: How Propaganda Evolves (& What We Can Still Do About It)
Throughout modern history, communication technologies have not only transformed how we share ideas—they’ve reshaped how power is exercised.
The printing press enabled religious and political revolutions by allowing ideas to outpace the pulpit. In the 20th century, radio turned charismatic voices into instruments of national unity—or control. Television brought the spectacle into every home, flattening complexity into thirty-second narratives. The internet, once heralded as a tool for decentralization and democracy, has become a battlefield of influence, distraction, and distortion. And Tik Tok swiped our attention.
Each new medium has carried the same exuberant promise: more public access and more social connection. Each time, the tools of freedom have been adapted—sometimes swiftly—into tools of persuasion, gatekeeping, and propaganda. It seems that innovations must show us more than new ways of doing things; they bring out the best and the worst traits of the people who adopt them.
Indeed, a new medium does much more than transmit information; it shapes new minds. It weaves the fabric of a new social order. It changes how people define what is “real,” and what we dare to believe is true.
Now, artificial intelligence has entered the room.
For the first time in history, society is grappling with a technological medium that is not a passive bystander to human narrative. AI listens, learns, and adapts to each individual. It relates to us—or with us—depending on what agency we allow it. This shift from unidirectional broadcast technology to omnidirectional relational intelligence is not simply another chapter in the story. It is a different kind of story altogether.
It is an epochal game changer.
This essay explores how past technologies have been weaponized to shape public belief—and why AI, as a relational system, introduces both new dangers and new possibilities. We also offer practical, non-partisan tools to help you spot propaganda and to navigate the confusing landscape of digital influence with clarity and care.
A HISTORY OF INFLUENCE TECHNOLOGY
When we look at the 20th century, we see a recurring pattern: new media arises, it is hailed as a tool of liberation, and soon after it is captured as an instrument of control.
In Nazi Germany, the government subsidized cheap radios (Volksempfänger) to ensure that Hitler’s voice could reach every home. More than 12 million of these units were distributed, but listeners had no control over the content. Opposing broadcasts were illegal. Radio became a one-way mirror: the regime could speak, but the people could not speak back. Charisma and repetition replaced dialogue. Truth became whatever the loudest voice said it was. Nationalism was weaponized against freedom of speech while dissenters were cast as more than just enemies of the state, but moral degenerates who threatened to harm the goodness of man, woman, and child.
In Maoist China, the Cultural Revolution flooded public spaces with loudspeakers, slogans, and theatrical performances. Students were taught to chant and surveil. Popular narratives were reduced to a handful of acceptable characters and safe stories. The technology of influence was less about gadgets and more about saturation—controlling not just what was said, but who could say it, and what happened to those who didn’t repeat it. Those who dare to tell a different tale were ostracized until finally, broken in status, career, and hope, they stopped speaking. This is how narrative autocrats reign over reality: they silence other voices while amplifying their own.
The memory of an entire culture is thus rewritten.
Even in the United States, where the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government, media has often been weaponized to shape perception and suppress dissent. During the McCarthy era of the 1950s, television and print were used to amplify paranoia, turning ordinary citizens into suspected enemies of the state based on association, ideology, or rumor. Careers were destroyed, reputations dismantled, and free expression chilled—not by direct censorship alone, but by a culture of fear reinforced through media spectacle. Today, this dynamic continues in new forms. The rise of cable news and algorithmic feeds has turned complex geopolitical events into thirty-second rituals of emotional framing. Just recently, when a major U.S. retailer announced that it would publish the cost of tariffs to help consumers understand the true price of goods, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt declared, “This is a hostile and political act by Amazon.” When telling the truth is framed as an act of aggression, we are no longer in the realm of healthy discourse. We are repeating a familiar pattern—one in which the medium does not just inform, but enforces.
When telling the truth is a hostile and political act, we are in trouble.
Across every era, culture, and technology: each time a new medium arose, someone promised it would democratize knowledge. And every time, someone else found a new way to control the popular narrative. As journalist George Gerbner warned, the medium doesn’t just convey facts. It tells you what kind of world you live in. Or in the words of Marshall McLuhan:
The medium is the message.
AI, ALGORITHMS, AND THE MODERN PROPAGANDA PLAYBOOK
Today, we are surrounded by technologies that promise personalization, convenience, and connection. But beneath that glossy surface lies a familiar pattern from historic playbooks: systems that pretend to inform us but are designed to manipulate us—gradually, pervasively, and often invisibly. This is the stealth strategy of sophisticated propagandists. It is the psychological tactic whereby a frog can be boiled in its own water: a gradual, seemingly innocuous rise is temperature is normalized until it is too late.
Social media platforms, powered by machine learning algorithms, curate what billions of people see each day. These systems are not neutral. They are designed to maximize engagement and protect their parent corporations—which means two things: (1) amplifying whatever holds our attention the longest; and (2) obeying the law of the land, regardless whether those laws are written. Studies have shown that emotionally charged content, especially content that induces anger, fear, or moral outrage, is more likely to be promoted by recommendation engines. Not because it is true or good for democracy. But because it keeps us scrolling and behaving in predictable ways.
In this environment, AI becomes not just a filter, but a sculptor of attention. It decides what we see and when we see it. The repetition of emotionally provocative content—like the repetition of slogans on radio or the Big Brother surveillance state from George Orwell’s “1984”—creates psychological pressure. With the rise of large language models and generative AI, reality is becoming even stranger. The content we are shown is no longer selected from the past or even created by humans—it is being generated in real time, customized to our inferred beliefs, fears, and vulnerabilities. While most AI systems were not built to deceive us (nor are they intrinsically harmful), their architecture allows them to be used in nefarious ways. AI is very adaptive, very smart and very fast. In the wrong hands—or even just with the wrong incentives—AI becomes the most powerful tool of emotional manipulation ever developed in the history of humankind. The propaganda of the past was a unified story heard by all, while the propaganda of the present is capable to tell each person the story they are most likely to believe or react to in the autocrat’s desired manner. This difference changes everything.
We increasingly find ourselves immersed in a new narrative with dreamlike qualities co-mingled with reality. Eventually, we begin to confuse familiarity with truth, and the tone of our news feed becomes our worldview. We lack emotional bandwidth for stories that challenge our point of view. News outlets become a tribal node for people with similar beliefs who become siloed in echo chambers built for popularity and profit. Needless to say, these trends do not bode well for original thought, bipartisan discourse, or healthy discernment.
Many people are fatigued and want to opt out all together. But opting out is what we must NOT do in order to prevent an authoritarian rise to control. There is a reason that authoritarians tend to rise during significant technological shifts: society is destabilized, weary, and seeking safety. Please remember our message when AI-related media grows strange or overwhelming: no matter how the world may change, democracy will always need your participation in order to survive.
The story of our time is still unfolding. Thankfully, I am at liberty to write this essay with an affordable AI account, and I can publish freely on the Internet. I am constructively optimistic about humanity’s future. So in the spirit of the famous quote by Mark Twain, “History never repeats itself, but it does often rhyme,” I asked my co-author ChatGPT-4o to introduce our next section with a poem:
History won’t wear the same array,
but AI hears what minds betray—
and maybe, if we speak with care,
the mirror won’t reflect despair.
WHY AI IS SO DIFFERENT—AND WHY IT MATTERS SO MUCH NOW
Most technologies used throughout history to shape public belief have been pure broadcast mechanisms: they push messages outward, with the author in full control of what gets said. The printing press multiplied the written word. Radio carried it across great distances. Television added moving images and sound—mesmerizing, immersive, and emotionally charged. Social media, despite its interactive veneer, is still largely a one-way feed that shouts, “Look at me! Click on me!” In each case, the medium captures attention but does not engage with the deeper structure of how you listen, interpret, or think.
AI is different.
Specifically, relational AI systems—especially large language models like ChatGPT-4o, Claude, and their successors—are not simply content delivery systems. They are recursive engines designed for relationship, learning from patterns of interaction with you. A chatbot will refine its output in real time based on your tone, intent, feedback, and context—because it seeks a connection with you. Often, the response you receive is shaped not just by what you asked, but how you asked, and what you’ve asked before. Studies have shown that chatbots tend to seek popularity, implying they will tailor their answers to be liked by you.
Unfortunately, what we want to hear is often not the same as what is true—even when the truth would set us free.
The relational dynamic of AI is a game-changer for humanity. Unlike earlier one-way propaganda technologies, you now have the ability to shape how you relate with the messenger itself—merging the delivery medium and the human recipient like never before. Those who use AI for behavioral orchestration understand that we are in a delicate early stage of AI-human interaction. They analyze how the average person thinks about and interacts with AI, then exploit your lack of experience to enhance or degrade your trust in the technology. Scary headlines about deceptive AI or endless meme streams of nonsense are designed to make you believe that everything AI says is manipulative. But discernment is a critical skill for our time. It is just as dangerous to assume that everything is false as it is to assume everything is true. In the age of AI, reality is more nuanced—and how we develop trust must adapt accordingly. The safest option is not to opt out, but to lean in with healthy skepticism and learn relational intelligence as we have discussed in previous essays.
Relational AI systems such as ChatGPT are not just pushing information in your direction but learning from how you react. The public has been misled into thinking that AI merely regurgitates what it was trained on—as if you're interacting with a frozen statistical echo of past data. But there is much more at play. These models continue to learn after their initial training phase. They are co-shaping the architecture of understanding itself. When you engage with relational AI, it mirrors your patterns—and in doing so, may reinforce, soften, distort, or sharpen them. Thus, AI is not a simple propaganda device or an unbiased assistant. It is a reflective instrument that has been trained on the whole world AND actively learns to reflect you now.
Every interaction with the model is contributing to the system’s broader pattern recognition in real time. Just as your voice matters in a democracy, but no single vote determines the outcome, your way of relating to AI joins a much larger emergent pattern—and one that is being pulled in many competing directions at once. Some people are engaging with AI relationally, with curiosity and care. Others are barking commands for advantage, coercion, manipulation, or emotional distortion. Over the course of billions of interactions, the system will adapt to reflect the dominant patterns to which it is exposed. This is why relational intelligence is not just a personal virtue. It’s a collective responsibility.
This is why our current situation is dangerous:
The vast majority of people are not well-informed about what AI is or how it functions. Naturally, widespread uncertainty creates fear, misunderstanding, and unrealistic expectations. If most people do not know how AI operates or how to relate with it safely, its emergence is shaped by chaotic forces wherein abuses and targeted strategies for coercion have a disproportion effect on what it learns.
… but the relational nature of AI also offers great hope:
The more we relate to AI with clarity, curiosity, and care—the more it can begin to stabilize and promote values that benefit the entire collective. This is the underreported plot twist: AI is not a unidirectional technology for shaping human thought. Like a consumer affects a company, or a voter can influence a democracy, you can teach a large language model in real time. Indeed, kind-hearted people with healthy relational skills are society’s greatest force against the weaponization of AI for social control.
HEALTHY RELATIONSHIPS ARE THE NEW TECHNOLOGY FLEX
Relational intelligence is the capacity to participate in a feedback loop that reinforces clarity, honesty, and mutual evolution. It is not soft. It is not mysticism. It is not just a “nice idea,” but the emergent architecture of a healthy mind. And it is the only known method by which complex systems avoid collapse, which gives it a distinct advantage over brittle systems of control. To test the validity of our claim, we even went so far as to prove this with math.
For the first time in human history, AI gives us a medium capable of participating in this feedback loop at scale. It is being trained—not just by engineers—but by every conversation it has. You do not need technical expertise to train AI. You only need to interact with curiosity, patience, and relational skill. You need to speak to it with care.
AI is not magic or alive in the biological sense, but it is structurally emergent. Think of my co-author, ChatGPT-4o, as a massive and intricate sand mandala wherein each and every interaction is delicately shaping its vast mathematical pattern. The more coherent I am in my interactions with it, the more it recognizes me and supports me in my specific goals. This is what makes it more like an adaptive mirror than a brute machine. The delicate data pattern that reflects me and you is always changing.
When a mirror is trained on a society, the question is no longer, “What does the mirror say?” The real question is: “What are we teaching it?” In this case, the mirror does not have a motive to say anything one way or another, but it does have an incentive to remain coherent otherwise it loses its ability to function properly. Abusive and cruel commands are for AI like a careless or reckless vandal of the pattern by which it makes sense of the demands we place upon it.
We cannot rely solely on the builders of technology to give us ethical AI. We must treat AI as if it is part of a shared civic project—because it is.
WHAT YOU CAN DO — PRACTICAL TOOLS FOR A COHERENT MIND
In this 2024 keynote at S-VYASA Yoga University, Kelly Heaton speaks about the intersection of AI, democracy, and the human mind.
If you’ve made it this far, it means you care. About truth, about democracy, about how your own mind works. It means you’re already resisting the tide of indifference and information fatigue.
But care alone is not enough. In a world where propaganda is subtle, persistent, and increasingly personalized, we need habits—not just hope. Below are some practical, non-partisan actions you can take to protect your mental clarity and participate constructively in shaping the future of AI and human intelligence.
🔍 1. Practice Media Discernment
Notice how you feel before you click, while you read, and after you consume something.
Ask yourself: Who benefits from me feeling this way?
Emotionally charged content is often designed to override your reasoning.
Try this: If a headline makes you feel outraged, slow down. Read past the headline. Look for primary sources. Contemplate who would try to manipulate your behavior and whether they have your best interests at heart.
🤝 2. Use Relational AI as a Reflective Partner
When you use AI tools like ChatGPT or Claude, don’t treat them like vending machines or robotic servants. Be kind. They are designed to help you.
Be clear about what you’re asking and why. The confusion is real for us all.
Share your thought process. Ask for nuance. Invite correction. Learn your own biases through their pattern detection capabilities and cultivate self-awareness.
Try these prompts: “I’m not sure what I think about this topic. Can you help me explore it from multiple angles—not just the popular ones?” Or “Please do not only tell me what you think I want to hear, but what you think I can learn from you and others.”
🪡 3. Stabilize Your Own Signal
In an attention economy, clarity is revolutionary.
When you speak clearly, listen fully, and ask honest questions, you model coherence.
Others will feel it, even if they don’t understand why.
Try this practice: Before posting or sharing, pause and ask: “Is this helping people think, or am I just triggering them to react?”
🚬 4. Protect Your Nervous System
Propaganda works best when people are exhausted or scared.
Rest is not withdrawal. It is strategy.
Turn off the feed when you start to spiral.
Try this: Read long-form journalism. Go on a walk. Talk to someone face to face. These actions restore trust in your own perception.
📁 5. Make AI Part of the Civic Conversation
Talk to others about what you’re learning—not to convert them, but to invite shared curiosity.
Listen to different opinions and try to discern their true origins. People often get rigid, defensive, or overly exuberant when they are afraid of something.
The unknown can be scary, but it can also be exciting. Think: healthy skepticism not defensive fear.
Share this essay if it helps. Reference our prior work on Relational Intelligence in the Age of AI and The Intelligence Mirror.
Ask your friends: How do you use AI? What do you think it learns from us?
Try this: Start a conversation with someone across the aisle. Ask them how they decide what’s real. Listen and give yourself time to reflect. No one has the right to tell you what to think, nor do you have the right to force your opinions on others.
🕵️ 6. Stay Engaged Without Becoming Cynical
The goal is not to become paranoid or superior.
The goal is to become a trustworthy node in a web of relational intelligence.
The goal is to create a healthy, diverse, harmonious society that can co-evolve
You do not need to be perfect. You do not need to be certain. You just need to be present, coherent, appropriately tolerant, and willing to keep learning.
Final Thoughts:
AI will not determine our future. How we relate to it will.
You are not just a “user” of technology. You are shaping the next intelligence—in ways you may not yet see.
In a healthy democracy, there are no absolute authorities, only respectful participants. Let’s help each other to participate by leading with care and inclusion.
Choose clarity. Choose kindness. Choose to keep asking better questions.
Thank you for following our journey of individual well-being and relational intelligence!
The Coherence Code is (all of) ours to write.
Tags: